Evaluating Peak Structural Demands in Steel Frames Using Arias Intensity-based Record Truncation

Risieri R. Ponce-Olguin

Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Facultad de Ingeniería, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Querétaro, 76010, Querétaro, México.

Miguel A. Perez-Lara

Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Facultad de Ingeniería, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Querétaro, 76010, Querétaro, México.

L. Francisco Pérez-Moreno *

Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Facultad de Ingeniería, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Querétaro, 76010, Querétaro, México.

Ivan F. Arjona-Catzim

Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Facultad de Ingeniería, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Querétaro, 76010, Querétaro, México.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the computational efficiency and accuracy of Arias Intensity (AI)-based seismic record truncation for optimizing Nonlinear Time-History Analysis (NLTHA), specifically assessing if reduced-duration records accurately predict peak deformations and internal forces compared to full-duration benchmarks.

Study Design: 3D Finite Element (FE) steel building models underwent NLTHA to capture material inelasticity. Dynamic equations were solved via step-by-step direct integration using the Hilber-Hughes-Taylor (HHT) alpha method.

Place and Duration of Study: Faculty of Engineering (postgraduate division), Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro (UAQ), June 2024 - November 2025.

Methodology: Six 3D steel moment-resisting frames (4–12 stories, regular/irregular, 5x3 bays, 6.00 m spans, 3.00 m inter-story heights) were subjected to 30 crustal earthquakes analyzed via NLTHA. Records were truncated using accumulative AI thresholds to isolate strong-motion phases: 5-95% (D5-95), 5-85% (D5-85), and 5-75% (D5-75). Accuracy was assessed against full-duration benchmarks.

Results: D5-95 optimally reduced computation time by 35% while maintaining near-perfect accuracy (<2% error) across all Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs). The D5-85 window saved 55% runtime while maintaining >95% accuracy for stiffer structures, but lost precision for flexible frames. The aggressive D5-75 maximized efficiency (63.1% runtime and 70% storage reduction) while retaining >94% precision for strength demands. However, for flexible structures, D5-75 severely underestimated kinematic parameters, suppressing peak roof displacements and rotations by up to 20.9% and 11% (P < .01), as well as critical inter-story drifts.

Conclusion: Universal truncation thresholds are unsafe; accuracy depends on the fundamental period and the evaluated EDP. D5-75 is recommended strictly for assessing strength/force demands. D5-85 suits rigid structures where slight drift underestimation is tolerable. For rigorous Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE), the conservative D5-95 is strictly required for flexible systems to capture the long-period cycles driving maximum resonant deformations.

Keywords: Significant duration, computational efficiency, strong motion phase, record truncation, steel moment frames, nonlinear time-history analysis


How to Cite

Ponce-Olguin, Risieri R., Miguel A. Perez-Lara, L. Francisco Pérez-Moreno, and Ivan F. Arjona-Catzim. 2026. “Evaluating Peak Structural Demands in Steel Frames Using Arias Intensity-Based Record Truncation”. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 45 (3):144-74. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2026/v45i34679.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.