Beyond Today's MRI: Machine Learning and AI Pioneering Tomorrow's Imaging Landscape

Yvanne Komenan *

University of Kennesaw State University, Georgia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: To survey the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in magnetic resonance imaging.

Objectives: To discuss the fundamental knowledge behind the concepts of magnetic resonance imaging, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. The interconnectivity between utilizing AI models and different MRI images to achieve perfect evaluation was also examined.

Discussion: Various MRI images were discussed, including magnetic resonance angiography, anatomical MRI, diffusion MRI, and functional MRI. Supervised and unsupervised machine learning are the types of ML that have found wide applications in MRI. For supervised machine learning, the various methods under this are k-space methods, image restoration methods, cross-domain methods, direct mapping, and unrolled optimization. Nonetheless, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the two noticeable AI models often employed during medical imaging.

Conclusions: In conclusion, artificial intelligence as a subset of machine learning has found wide medical applications to MRI. The emerging technology of AI in MRI has profound future applications in medical field.

Keywords: Machine learning, magnetic resonance imaging, cancer, artificial intelligence, diagnosis tests


How to Cite

Komenan, Yvanne. 2024. “Beyond Today’s MRI: Machine Learning and AI Pioneering Tomorrow’s Imaging Landscape”. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 43 (6):142-51. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2024/v43i64394.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fang AM, Shumaker LA, Martin KD. Multi-institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions. Cancer. 2022;128(18): 3287-3296. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34355

Kim DY, Sun JS, Kim EY, Park KJ, You S. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of ct guided percutaneous lung biopsy with a coaxial cutting needle for the diagnosis of lung cancer in patients with UIP pattern. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1).

Marmolejo DH, Wong MYZ, Bajalica-Lagercrantz S, Tischkowitz M, Balmaña J. extended ERN-GENTURIS thematic group 3. Overview of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) guidelines across Europe. Eur J Med Genet. 2021;64(12): 104350. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104350

Marmolejo DH, Wong MYZ, Bajalica-Lagercrantz S, Tischkowitz M, Balmaña J. extended ERN-GENTURIS thematic group 3. Overview of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) guidelines across Europe. Eur J Med Genet. 2021;64(12):104350. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104350

Patel HD, Koehne EL, Shea SM. Systematic versus targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy among men with visible lesions. J Urol; 2022;207(1):108-117. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002120

Rahman WT, Gerard S, Grundlehner P. Outcomes of high-risk breast MRI screening in women without prior history of breast cancer: Effectiveness data from a tertiary care center. J Breast Imaging. 2024;6(1):53–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbad092

Haji-Valizadeh H, Shen D, Avery RJ, Serhal AM, Schiffers FA, Katsaggelos AK. Rapid reconstruction of four-dimensional MR angiography of the thoracic aorta using a convolutional neural network. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. 2020;2: e190205.

Eo T, Jun Y, Kim T, Jang J, Lee H-J, Hwang D. KIKI-net: Cross-domain convolutional neural networks for reconstructing undersampled magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2018;80:2188–201.

Jethi AK, Murugesan B, Ram K, Sivaprakasam M. Dual-encoder-unet for fast mri reconstruction. 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging Workshops (ISBI Workshops). 2020;1–4.

Liu J, Sun Y, Eldeniz C, Gan W, An H, Kamilov US. RARE: Image reconstruction using deep priors learned without groundtruth. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process. 2020;14:1088–99.

Sim AJ, Kaza E, Singer L, Rosenberg SA. A review of the role of MRI in diagnosis and treatment of early stage lung cancer, clinical & translational radiation oncology; 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.06.002

Lehman CD, Lee JM, DeMartini WB, Hippe DS, Rendi MH, Kalish G, Porter P, Gralow J, Partridge SC. Screening MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(3):1-8.

Callender T, Emberton M, Morris S, Pharoah PDP, Pashayan N. Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness associated with magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in age-based and risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer. JAMA Network Open, 2021;4(3):e2037657. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37657

Petralia G, Zugni F, Summers PE, Colombo A, Pricolo P, Grazioli L, Colagrande S, Giovagnoni A, Padhani AR. Whole‑body magnetic resonance imaging (WB‑MRI) for cancer screening: Recommendations for use. La radiologia medica. 2021;126:1434–1450. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01392-2

Zhang CY. Effectiveness of early cancer detection method: magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray technique. Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Medicine and Global Health; 2023. DOI: 10.54254/2753-8818/6/20230279

Lubinski J, Kotsopoulos J, Moller P, Pal T, Eisen A. MRI surveillance and breast cancer mortality in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variations. JAMA Oncol; 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6944

Patel HD, Remmers S, Ellis JL, Li EV, Roobol MJ, Fang AM, Davik P, Rais-Bahrami S, Murphy AB, Ross AE, Gupta GN. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging–based risk calculators to predict prostate cancer risk. JAMA Network Open. 2024;7(3):e241516. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1516

Knoll F, Murrell T, Sriram A, Yakubova N, Zbontar J, Rabbat M, et al. Advancing machine learning for MR image reconstruction with an open competition: Overview of the 2019 fastMRI challenge. Magn Reson Med. 2023;84: 3054–70.

Hauptmann A, Arridge S, Lucka F, Muthurangu V, Steeden JA. Real-time cardiovascular MR with spatio-temporal artifact suppression using deep learning–proof of concept in congenital heart disease. Magn Reson Med 2024;81:1143–56.

Knoll F, Zbontar J, Sriram A, Muckley MJ, Bruno M, Defazio A. Fast MRI: A publicly available raw k-space and DICOM dataset of knee images for accelerated MR image reconstruction using machine learning. Radiology: Artificial intelligence. 2023; 2:e190007.

Khanna VV, Chadaga K, Sampathila N, Prabhu S, Chadaga R, Umakanth S. Diagnosing COVID-19 using artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review. Netw. Model. Anal. Health Inform. Bioinform. 2022;11:25.

Zhuo Z, Zhang J, Duan Y, Qu L, Feng C, Huang X, Cheng D, Xu X, Sun T, Li Z.. Automated classification of intramedullary spinal cord tumors and inflammatory demyelinating lesions using deep learning. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2022;4:e210292.

Rocca MA, Anzalone N, Storelli L, Del Poggio A, Cacciaguerra L, Manfredi AA, Meani A, Filippi M. Deep learning on conventional magnetic resonance imaging improves the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis mimics. Investig. Radiol. 2021;56:252–260.

Liu S, Zheng H, Feng Y, Li W. Prostate cancer diagnosis using deep learning with 3D multiparametric MRI. In Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis; SPIE: Orlando, FL, USA, 2017;10134:581–584.