Clinical Trial of the Canary System for Proximal Caries Detection: A Comparative Study
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology,
Background: Detecting initial caries on the proximal surfaces of teeth in an intact dentition is a problem in dental practice since radiograph has been shown to have poor sensitivity with this stage of caries lesions. Hence there is need for an alternative technology.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the Canary System (CS) to detect proximal caries in a clinical setting, comparing it with bitewing radiography (BWR).
Methodology: 33 subjects, age 18 years and above, were recruited from a mixed population of low, moderate, and high caries risk patients. BWR and the CS were used to detect proximal caries lesions in these subjects. Teeth were separated by 48 hours insertion of rubber rings, and the proximal surfaces were examined by direct visual examination using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS-II) scoring system. The Sensitivity (se), specificity (sp), positive (ppv) and negative predictive (npv) values of the CS and BWR in detecting caries on proximal surfaces were calculated by evaluating each method alone against ICDAS-II system (used as bronze standard). The two methods were compared statistically using their Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUC). The sensitivities and specificities were compared using a test of proportions and AUC values were compared using DeLong’s method of nonparametric testing of AUC values.
Results: The se, sp, ppv and npv for the CS are 0.92, 0.78, 0.89, 0.84 respectively, and for BWR are 0.67, 0.54, 0.78, and 0.40 respectively. The AUC of the Canary System (0.77) was statistically significantly higher than the AUC of the radiography (0.53, P < .001).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the efficacy of the Canary System in detecting proximal caries lesions to be greater than that of bitewing radiography.
Clinical Significance: The Canary System can be a valuable clinical device for detecting and monitoring proximal caries lesions in clinical practice.
- Bitewing radiography
- canary system
- proximal caries
- caries diagnostics
- caries detection
- ICDAS-II system
How to Cite
Pitts NB, Richards D. Personalized treatment planning. In: Pitts NB. Detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries. Monographs in Oral Science. Basel: Karger. 2009:128-43.
Featherstone JD. The continuum of dental caries--evidence for a dynamic disease process. J Dent Res. 2004;83 (Spec No C):C39-42.
Wenzel A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions. J Dent Res 2004;83 (Spec No C):C72-5.
Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:170-8.
Li G, Qu XM, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries by digital radiographs: an in vivo and in vitro comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:463-7.
Mitropoulos P, Rahiotis C, Stamatakis H, Kakaboura A. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2010;38:859-67.
Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994;28:363-7.
Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent. 2002;62:201-13.
Braga MM, Morais CC, Nakama RC, Leamari VM, Siqueira WL, Mendes FM. In vitro performance of methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e35-41.
Pitts NB, Longbottom C. Temporary tooth separation with special reference to the diagnosis and preventive management of equivocal approximal carious lesions. Quintessence Int. 1987;18:563-73.
Jeon RJ, Han C, Mandelis A, Sanchez V, Abrams SH. Diagnosis of pit and fissure caries using frequency-domain infrared photothermal radiometry and modulated laser luminescence. Caries Res. 2004;38:497-513.
Garcia JA, Mandelis A, Abrams SH, Matvienko A. Photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence: applications for dental caries detection. In: Popp J, Tuchin VV, Chiou A, Heinemann SH. Handbook of biophotonics, vol. 2: Photonics for health care. Berlin: Wiley-VCH, 2011:1047-52.
Jeon RJ, Mandelis A, Sanchez V, Abrams SH. Nonintrusive, noncontacting frequencydomain photothermal radiometry and luminescence depth profilometry of carious and artificial subsurface lesions in human teeth. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9: 804-19.
Jallad M, Zero D, Eckert G, Ferreira Zandona A. In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods. Caries Res. 2015;49(5):523-30.
Silvertown JD, Wong BP, Abrams SH, Sivagurunathan KS, Mathews SM, Amaechi BT. Comparison of The Canary System and DIAGNOdent for the in vitro detection of caries under opaque dental sealants. J Investig Clin Dent; 2016.
Silvertown JD, Wong BP, Sivagurunathan KS, Abrams SH, Kirkham J, Amaechi BT. Remineralization of natural early caries lesions in vitro by P11 -4 monitored with photothermal radiometry and luminescence. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017; 8(4).
Herzog K, D'Elia M, Kim A, Slayton RL. Pilot Study of the Canary System Use in the Diagnosis of Approximal Carious Lesions in Primary Molars. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37(7):525-9.
Dayo AF, Amaechi BT, Noujeim M, Deahl ST, Gakunga P, Katkar R. Comparison of photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence, intraoral radiography, and cone beam computed tomography for detection of natural caries under restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020;129(5): 539-548.
Jan J, Wan Bakar WZ, Mathews SM, Okoye LO, Ehler BR, Louden C, Amaechi BT. Proximal caries lesion detection using the Canary Caries Detection System: an in vitro study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2016;7(4):383-390.
Brown LJ, Wall TP, Lazar V. Trends in caries among adults 18 to 45 years old. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(7):827-34.
Available:http://www.ada.org/sections/professionalResources/docs/topics_caries_over6.doc. Accessed October 24, 2021.
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Professionally applied topical fluoride: Evidence-based clinical recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(8);11511159.
Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DN, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res. 2008;42(2): 79–87.
Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res. 2008;42(4):297–304.
Amaechi BT. Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence: The Canary System. In: A. Ferreira Zandona, C. Longbottom (eds.), Detection and Assessment of Dental Caries, Springer Nature, Switzerland AG. 2019:177-186.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a non-parametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–845.
Silvertown JD, Abrams SH, Sivagurunathan KS, Kennedy J, Jeon J, Mandelis A, Hellen A, Hellen W, Elman G, Ehrlich R, Chouljian R, Finer Y, Amaechi BT. Multi-Centre Clinical Evaluation of Photothermal Radiometry and Luminescence Correlated with International Benchmarks for Caries Detection. Open Dent J. 2017;11:636-647.
Abrams SH, Sivagurunathan KS, Silvertown JD, Wong B, Hellen A, Mandelis A, Hellen WMP, Elman GI, Mathew SM, Mensinkai PK, Amaechi BT. Correlation with Caries Lesion Depth of The Canary System, DIAGNOdent and ICDAS II. Open Dent J. 2017;11:679-689.
Schwendicke F, Tzschoppe M, Paris S. Radiographic caries detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(8):924-33.
Xing H, Eckert GJ, Ando M. Detection ability and direction effect of photothermalradiometry and modulated-luminescence for non-cavitated approximal caries. J Dent. 2019; 90:103221.
Vaarkamp J, ten Bosch JJ, Verdonschot EH, Bronkhoorst EM. The real performance of bitewing radiography and fiber-optic transillumination in approximal caries diagnosis. J Dent Res. 2000;79(10): 1747-51.
van Rijkom HM, Verdonschot EH. Factors involved in validity measurements of diagnostic tests for approximal caries: a meta-analysis. Caries Res. 1995;29(5): 364-70.
Freitas LA, Santos MT, Guaré RO, Lussi A, Diniz MB. Association between visual inspection, caries activity status, and radiography with treatment decisions on approximal caries in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(2):140-7.
Ribeiro AA, Purger F, Rodrigues JA, Oliveira PR, Lussi A, Monteiro AH, Alves HD, Assis JT, Vasconcellos AB. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study. Caries Res. 2015;49(2):99-108.
de Araujo FB, de Araujo DR, dos Santos CK, de Souza MA. Diagnosis of approximal caries in primary teeth: radiographic versus clinical examination using tooth separation. Am J Dent. 1996;9(2):54-6.
Abstract View: 403 times
PDF Download: 134 times