Effect of Board Diversity on Organisation Performance, A Case of Kenya Ports Authority Mombasa, Kenya

Main Article Content

Beatrice Nyagilo
Phelista Njeru

Abstract

The global business landscape is increasingly becoming complex and unpredictable. For corporations to survive in these increasingly competitive markets, they have to be flexible and meet their customer requirements. It is on this basis that relation between strategic corporate governance and organisation performance has evoked much interest among scholars. This study investigated the impact of strategic corporate governance on organisation performance of Kenya Ports Authority in Mombasa Kenya. Specifically, the study investigated the effect of board diversity on the performance of KPA. The study adopted a cross-sectional descriptive survey design where 55 board of directors, general managers and head of division of KPA were targeted. The sample size was 48 and stratified sampling technique was employed to identify respondents that participated in the study. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect the data from the respondents. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the data using frequency tables, percentages, and measures of central tendency used included mode, median and mean. The inferential statistics used was multiple regression, which established whether there was a significant relationship between board size, board independence, board diversity and committee members’ competency on the performance of KPA. The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software and presented using tables and figure. The study found that 59.8 per cent of the organisation performance at KPA could be attributed to strategic corporate governance. The study also found out that board diversity had a statistically significant impact on the organisation performance of KPA. This study recommends KPA to strive and incorporate board diversity Competency in its strategic corporate governance objectives if it were to enhance its performance.

Keywords:
Strategic corporate, corporate governance, organisation performance, board diversity, Mombasa ports.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nyagilo, B., & Njeru, P. (2020). Effect of Board Diversity on Organisation Performance, A Case of Kenya Ports Authority Mombasa, Kenya. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39(33), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i3331018
Section
Short Research Articles

References

Eccles RG, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustains ability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science. 2014;60(11):2835–2857.

Dalton DR, Dalton CM. Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition and financial performance. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2011.

Velnampy T. Corporate governance and firm performance: A study of Sri Lankan Manufacturing Companies; 2013.

Giannetti M, Zhao M. Board diversity and firm performance volatility; 2016.

Gavrea C, Ilies L, Stegerean R. Determinants of organizational performance: The case of Romania. Management & Marketing. 2011;6(2).

CMA. New corporate governance code for listed companies and guidelines on prevention of money laundering and terrorism financing in capital markets gazetted; 2015.

Wu SPJ, Straub DW, Liang TP. How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. Mis Quarterly. 2015;39(2):497–518.

Larcker D, Tayan B. Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Pearson Education; 2015.

Adams RB, de Haan J, Terjesen S, van Ees H. Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2015;23(2):77–82.

Terjesen S, Couto EB, Francisco PM. A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance. 2016;20(3):447–483.

Mahadeo JD, Soobaroyen T, Hanuman V. Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics. 2012;105(3):375- 388.

Jones TM, Wicks AC, Freeman RE. Stake holder theory: The state of the art. The Black Well Guide to Business Ethics. 2017;17–37.

Adams, et al. with regard to representation. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2015;30(3):607–610.

Ararat M, Aksu M, Tansel Cetin A. How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2015;23(2):83–103.

Roberts Helen, Whiting Rosalind H. Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier. 2015;35(PA):381-401.

Osoo W, Onen D. A general guide to writing research proposal and report (2nd Ed.). Makerere University: Makerere University Printery; 2008.

Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970;30(3):607–610.

Touliatos JS, Compton NH. Research Methods in human ecology/home economics. Iowa University Press/AMES; 1998.

Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research method for business studies (5th Ed.). Edinburgh Gate, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, England; 2009.

Ott RL, Longnecker MT. An introduction to statistical methods and information analysis. Nelson Education; 2015.

Oketch MM, W. Top managers sacked over corruption at KPA; 2018.

McLeod SA. Questionnaire: Definition, examples, design and types. Simply Psychology; 2018.