• Submission

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Articles in Press
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Reprints
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving Policy
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Books
  • Testimonials
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2020 - Volume 39 [Issue 9]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Agronomic Evaluation of Fodder Sorghum Varieties under Different Dates of Sowing

  • K. Saimaheswari
  • T. Prathima
  • D. Subramanyam
  • P. Latha

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, Page 25-32
DOI: 10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i930603
Published: 8 May 2020

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract


A field study conducted during the summer season of 2018 at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, to evaluate the sowing time and varieties on growth, yield and quality of fodder sorghum. The results revealed that plant height, dry matter production, leaf area, stem diameter, leaf stem ratio significantly decreased with delay in sowing from I FN of January to II FN of February at all stages of plant growth. Significantly higher crude protein and ash contents were observed with the crop sown during I fortnight of January. Late sowing of the crop during II fortnight of February recorded higher crude fibre. Among various varieties tested, higher growth parameters, green and dry fodder yields were recorded with CSV 32 F than rest of varieties. CSV 32 F has recorded highest crude protein and ash content, while the higher crude fibre content was recorded with CSV 21 F. The highest gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio were obtained when the crop is sown during I FN of January which was significantly superior to other times of sowing. Among tested varieties, CSV 32 F variety recorded significantly higher returns.


Keywords:
  • Summer
  • sowing time
  • varieties
  • Full Article PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Saimaheswari, K., Prathima, T., Subramanyam, D., & Latha, P. (2020). Agronomic Evaluation of Fodder Sorghum Varieties under Different Dates of Sowing. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39(9), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i930603
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

Singh S, Singh TN. Response of maize crop to early and late summer sowing conditions. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2000;5(4):307-313.

Mishra JS, Kumar R, Ravikumar S, Kumar R, Praksh V, Rao KK, Bhatt BP. Production potential of improved grain sorghum cultivars (Sorghum bicolor) under staggered plantings in non-traditional areas of eastern in India. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2017;62(1):74-80.

Srivastava NN, Rao VUM, Subba Rao AVM. Radiation and water use efficiencies of a popular variety (SPV 462) and a promising hybrid (CSH 14) of sorghum under semi arid climatic conditions of Hyderabad. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research & Development. 2009;24(2):46-52.

Desai KL, Kumar D, Arvadiya LK. Patel NM. Growth and yield behavior of rabi season sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] as influenced by different sowing dates and planting geometry. The Ecoscan. 2015;473-476.

Akbari KN, Sutaria GS, Hirpara DS, Gandhi AP. Response of different fodder sorghum genotypes to nitrogen in dryland condition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2000;3:197-199.

Chandrika V, Shashikala T, Shanti M, Reddy LK. Production potential of multicut fodder bajra genotypes under varied dates of sowing. Journal of Research ANGRAU. 2012;40(3):54-57.

Meena H, Meena PKP, Singh P, Kumhar BL. Assessment of hybrid fodder sorghum (Sugargraze) quality parameters. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience. 2007;5(2):92- 95.
  • Abstract View: 717 times
    PDF Download: 478 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. All rights reserved.